Page 1 of 1
Why ImgBurn?
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:09 am
by tokeL
I want to store br-rips as .iso.
Everywhere it is recommended that you'd use ImgBurn, even with macOS.
I managed to run it through Wine.
(Using 32b-xp-mode.)
But,
Does
anybody know, how the end result differs from making .cdr in Disk Utility and then
Code: Select all
hdiutil makehybrid -iso -joliet -o ~/Desktop/filename.iso ~/Desktop/filename.cdr
?
Re: Why ImgBurn?
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:27 am
by tokeL
...and to preserve UDF 2.5:
Code: Select all
hdiutil makehybrid -iso -joliet -udf -udf_version 2.5 -o output_filename.iso filename.cdr
...right?
Re: Why ImgBurn?
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:35 am
by Coopervid
tokeL wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:27 am
...and to preserve UDF 2.5:
Code: Select all
hdiutil makehybrid -iso -joliet -udf -udf_version 2.5 -o output_filename.iso filename.cdr
...right?
Read this:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=33765
Re: Why ImgBurn?
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2025 4:48 pm
by tokeL
Coopervid wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:35 am
tokeL wrote: ↑Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:27 am
...and to preserve UDF 2.5:
Code: Select all
hdiutil makehybrid -iso -joliet -udf -udf_version 2.5 -o output_filename.iso filename.cdr
...right?
Read this:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=33765
Well, few things:
1. MacOS and underlaying freeBSD does support UDF. Both reading and writing.
From 10.5(2007) there has been support for UDF 2.50.
How do you think DVDfab works in macOS?
2. There is no discussion in that thread, why Imgburn is better than alternatives.
What is the secret sauce of Imgburn?