www.makemkv.com

You have to transfer the generated metadata levels to the original P7 RPU with workflow 2-3. You'll have to transfer levels 12389 but you may have to transfer 12 and then 389(I'm not sure if 12389 will work). If you didn't use the original scene cuts, you have to transfer them too but as I said earl...

If I run 3-1 to generate a new RPU for a profile 7 FEL MKV with static metadata, will the FEL be analyzed together with the BL by CM Analyzer? No, 3-1 doesnt bake FEL. I tried bake encoding the BL+FEL into a ProRes .mov with 8-2 and then running 3-1 on the resulting ProRes .mov, but I received an e...

daffie wrote: ↑

Thu Nov 14, 2024 8:45 am

Thanks for your help!
Do I need to use workflow 4-1 for this?

workflow 1

daffie wrote: ↑

Tue Nov 12, 2024 1:42 pm

I have a profile 7 mkv of this movie - is there a way to make a P8 rip from it while keep all the EL data ?
Not with this German disc I guess?

Remove the EL and inject this RPU:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1urqjRi ... drive_link

valington wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:18 am

maybe try to do this film in TS container and it will be proper in ts muxer

tsmuxer doesn't support ST-DL authoring.
anyway the problem is the EL and german discs

so in the question I pointed out that technically it is still not correct and it is not allowed to make such remuxs. Perhaps I had another look at this movie and indeed a P7 mux with dovi_tool or mkvtoolnix is still wrong. The RPU extracted from tsmuxer demuxed hevc is fine though so a P8 rip works.

i dont know but my p8 remux is perfectly in sync with the BL scene cuts

I dont know. I watched this one in Profile 8 without EL and everything was fine.

prores encode probably change the grain structure a little bit so small variation like that is normal

The winner ended up being MKV although I have a good CPU (AMD Ryzen 7 7700x), but that's not the point.

Thats surprising. On my i9 13900ks it's almost two times faster with prores.

right

I dont know, never watched it. I dont like old movies.

@RESET_9999 in the most recent update you introduced the possibility to measure brightness of an HDR10 video on a frame-by-frame basis, which, to me, seems the most correct approach. Does this mean the MadVR method is less accurate even with excluded letterboxes? does it work on a scene-by-scene ba...

No, static DV metadata for a movie graded in the 1000-4000nits is not good and probably worse than static HDR10 because DV metadata is a lot more aggressive than HDR10 static curves. For example if you have a 4000nits grade with a static 1000nits DV metadata. All the low-nits scenes will be darker a...

It depends on how your TV handles the HDR10 static metadata and how the HDR10 encode metadata is set. For example if the movie HDR10 doesn't have maxcll/fall avlues with a 4000nits MDL, the tone mapping curve your TV will use might introduce some tone mapping even if the content is at SDR level. in ...

It's because DV has a 100nits floor(except the earliest version of the algo) for L1 and values under 100nits are not allowed. It wouldn't matter anyway because any L1 value below your TV target tells the TV to not do any tone mapping. So if you have a 800nits TV, any value between 100-800nits wont h...