Max FALL and CLL values

MKV playback, recompression, remuxing, codec packs, players, howtos, etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
longseason
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:00 pm

Max FALL and CLL values

#1 Post by longseason » Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:23 pm

When re-encoding MKV files I want to retain the HDR information which is pretty easy now with the relevant x265 options.

However I'm having trouble determining values for --max-cll based on the CLL and FALL values in the source.

I've seen lots of examples of this output in mediainfo, but for the source files I have (straight rips from MakeMKV) there never seems to be these values (although there are all the other appropriate HDR values for mastering/color profiles).

Should these values _always_ exist if a UHD Blu Ray source has HDR, and therefore mediainfo is for some reason not displaying them? Or is it the case that these values only sometimes exist, so in my examples they're just not there?

Woodstock
Posts: 10332
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:21 pm

Re: Max FALL and CLL values

#2 Post by Woodstock » Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:34 pm

What program are you trying to get help on? You didn't mention it.

dcoke22
Posts: 3106
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 11:25 pm

Re: Max FALL and CLL values

#3 Post by dcoke22 » Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:13 pm

I assume you mean values like this:

Code: Select all

Maximum Content Light Level              : 1000 cd/m2
Maximum Frame-Average Light Level        : 168 cd/m2
What version of MakeMKV was used to create the MKVs that don't seem to have this data?

longseason
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:00 pm

Re: Max FALL and CLL values

#4 Post by longseason » Tue Oct 27, 2020 9:25 am

Those are the values I mean yes. Sorry I should've attached more information!

I used MakeMKV 1.15.3 from the Linux CLI (makemkvcon) just using the standard mkv rip. I've attached a copy of the mediainfo output from the ripped DVD (using mediainfo 20.09) that cuts off just after the audio track information starts for brevity.

I'm assuming during the re-encode that the MaxCLL and MaxFALL values are valuable and that encoding HDR info without them isn't of much use (or will produce non-optimal HDR results at least)?
Attachments
makemkv-hdr.txt
(2.65 KiB) Downloaded 596 times

dcoke22
Posts: 3106
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2020 11:25 pm

Re: Max FALL and CLL values

#5 Post by dcoke22 » Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:04 pm

I looked at the mediaInfo for all of my UHDs. Many had what appeared to be reasonable values. A few had no values. At least one had what appeared to be wrong values.

Probably wrong values:

Code: Select all

Maximum Content Light Level              : 1000 cd/m2
Maximum Frame-Average Light Level        : 1000 cd/m2
At first I thought it was a difference between SMPTE 2084, SMPTE 2086, or SMPTE 2094, but I don't think that it is the case. I strongly doubt it is a value that MakeMKV is calculating. I suspect it is a value that is written to the movie when it is mastered by the studio & MakeMKV is just copying it when it is present.

Next I used ffprobe to look at one of my UHD rips that had no values. The data in the file shows 0.

Code: Select all

 "side_data_type": "Content light level metadata",
 "max_content": 0,
 "max_average": 0
See the link below for an example of the ffprobe command line.
https://codecalamity.com/encoding-uhd-4 ... th-ffmpeg/

Using ffprobe is probably a more reliable way to find those values than relying on mediaInfo.
Last edited by dcoke22 on Wed Oct 28, 2020 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

longseason
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:00 pm

Re: Max FALL and CLL values

#6 Post by longseason » Tue Oct 27, 2020 11:22 pm

Presumably that means it doesn't matter if they're set to 0 in that case if they sometimes are? I tried the ffprobe method with a demuxed m2ts rip that was originally Dolby Vision (but just the HDR encoded video track, not the Dolby Vision track) and that reported CLL and FALL values of 0, so looks like these may sometimes just be the values.

I don't have any standard (non-DV) HDR sources to test on at the moment (just encoded ones that I'm now curious as to whether they're wrong), so I'll try that shortly.

Post Reply