I have a Roku 3 on the way. I only plan on using it to watch blu ray .mkv rips from a external drive via USB. From what I gather I can't play it right away without encoding it with handbrake/whatever.
Would WD TV be a better choice or does it have the same issue? Or is this a non-issue since I'd be better off using handbrake to reduce file size since picture quality is pretty close?
Roku 3 vs. WD TV
-
Chetwood
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:16 am
Re: Roku 3 vs. WD TV
No, the WDTV does NOT have this issue, there's no need to recode files.
MultiMakeMKV: MakeMKV batch processing (Win)
MultiShrink: DVD Shrink batch processing
Offizieller Uebersetzer von DVD Shrink deutsch
MultiShrink: DVD Shrink batch processing
Offizieller Uebersetzer von DVD Shrink deutsch
-
jlenny
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 2:16 am
Re: Roku 3 vs. WD TV
Thanks for the response.
Would encoding the original file to be playable on the Roku impact video quality much? If not I might end up keeping it.
Would encoding the original file to be playable on the Roku impact video quality much? If not I might end up keeping it.
-
BaronVonJ
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 2:14 am
Re: Roku 3 vs. WD TV
What encoding do you need to do? I have a Roku 2 XS and haven't had to do any re-encoding with my BD -> MKV rips. It doesn't decode or pass-thru DTS-HDMA, but the disc has the DTS-HD so I just rip that rather then encoding from DTS-HDMA.