Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Please post here for issues related to Blu-ray discs
codefast
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:03 pm

Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by codefast »

Hi there,

Has anyone had any luck backing up their Star Trek Into Darkness Blu ray using MakeMKV? I just got a disk from Amazon that isn't even allowing me to select the backup option. I'm waiting to test it in another blu ray player, but thought I'd ask if someone had done this successfully.

Thanks.
Sekkyo
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:16 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Sekkyo »

Same here. I don't know what Paramount did, but I'm getting all sorts of SCSI errors when I attempt to read the disk. I'm going to reboot and see if that helps, I have both Mac OS X 10.8 and Windows 8.1 at my disposal.
webminster
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:26 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by webminster »

Using 1.8.4, opening the disc throws a lot of errors to the screen, and I ultimately wind up with only the choice of the DVD (7gb) title set. This on the combo DVD+BluRay+digcopy version of the disc.


MakeMKV v1.8.4 win(x64-release) started
Using direct disc access mode
IFO file for VTS #4 is corrupt, VOB file must be scanned. This may take very long time, please be patient.
Title #2 has length of 2 seconds which is less than minimum title length of 120 seconds and was therefore skipped
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #5 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #6 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #7 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #8 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #9 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #10 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #11 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #19 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #20 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #21 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #22 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #23 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #30 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #31 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #32 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #33 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #34 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #35 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #36 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #37 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #38 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #39 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #40 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #41 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #49 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #50 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #51 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #52 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #53 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #54 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #55 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #56 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #57 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #58 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #59 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #60 was added (34 cell(s), 2:11:47)
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #61 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #62 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #63 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #74 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #75 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #76 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #77 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #78 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #79 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #80 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #81 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Title #88 was added (10 cell(s), 0:09:39)
Title #89 was added (7 cell(s), 0:05:36)
Title #90 was added (14 cell(s), 0:09:39)
Title #91 was added (10 cell(s), 0:05:36)
Title #92 has length of 91 seconds which is less than minimum title length of 120 seconds and was therefore skipped
Operation successfully completed
Using direct disc access mode
Calculated BUP offset for VTS #5 does not match one in IFO header.
IFO file for VTS #14 is corrupt, VOB file must be scanned. This may take very long time, please be patient.
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #60 was added (34 cell(s), 2:11:47)
Title #88 was added (10 cell(s), 0:09:39)
Title #89 was added (7 cell(s), 0:05:36)
Title #90 was added (14 cell(s), 0:09:39)
Title #91 was added (10 cell(s), 0:05:36)
Title #92 has length of 91 seconds which is less than minimum title length of 120 seconds and was therefore skipped
Operation successfully completed
Sekkyo
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 11:16 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Sekkyo »

I was able to get it going after a reboot, full backup worked successfully. I must have been having issues with the DASPI filter under Mac OS X.
webminster
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:26 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by webminster »

I'm running on Windows7 Home Premium x64, myself... Looks like MakeMKV thinks the whole Bluray structure is bogus. All I can get is the DVD version off the disc.
Jon Walker
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 3:15 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Jon Walker »

codefast wrote: Has anyone had any luck backing up their Star Trek Into Darkness Blu ray using MakeMKV? I just got a disk from Amazon that isn't even allowing me to select the backup option. I'm waiting to test it in another blu ray player, but thought I'd ask if someone had done this successfully.
I had no trouble ripping the main movie on my Mac yesterday. Just re-checked and both the 2D and 3D discs open with option to "Backup" the content. Discs package also purchased through Amazon. Disc opening tested on LG WH14NS40 and Pioneer BDR-208 drives using registered MakeMKV v1.8.4 software. Same results for all tests but I did not actually run a full backup since I use iTunes to manage playback to/from IOS mobile and ?TV2 devices.
Image
Chilkoot
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:44 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Chilkoot »

Well, this doesn't help anyone, but with 1.8.4, the Into Darkness disc read and ripped as per normal (for me at least) under Windows 7 64-bit. This was the standalone 2D Blu-ray version released in Canada.
flyimages
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:40 am
Location: Vegas

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by flyimages »

No issues for me, using v1.85 win7 64bit. 2d version
webminster
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:26 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by webminster »

Not sure if this is my Bluray drive or what, haven't had issues to this point. But MakeMKV identifies the disk as a DVD, not Blu-Ray, and reports the above (like it can't recognize the BD titles). This on a new replacement BD+DVD disk.
Skipadeedoodah
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:22 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Skipadeedoodah »

I had the same slew of errors reported when trying to make a backup. Turns out I had the DVD disc in the drive. Swapped it for the BluRay and everything works perfectly.

Not sure why it had such an issue with the DVD backup...

Edit: v1.8.5, Korora Linux 19, x64, GNOME. BluRay + DVD + Digital bought from Amazon US.
Woodstock
Posts: 10311
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:21 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Woodstock »

Skipadeedoodah wrote:Not sure why it had such an issue with the DVD backup...
Considering the "Backup" feature is for BD only, it isn't surprising it didn't work.

The only option with DVDs should be to open them and save tracks as MKV files, which is also an option with BDs.
Skipadeedoodah
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:22 am

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Skipadeedoodah »

Woodstock wrote:Considering the "Backup" feature is for BD only, it isn't surprising it didn't work.
Huh, would you look at that, MakeMKV has a "Backup" function - never used that before. Bad/coincidental choice of terminology on my part when describing the issue.

The issue I had experienced occurred when using the standard "Open disc" function that allows you to select Video/Audio channels to pack into an mkv. That's what choked on the DVD, but was fine on the BluRay.
OneFastSkater
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:47 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by OneFastSkater »

Skipadeedoodah wrote:I had the same slew of errors reported when trying to make a backup. Turns out I had the DVD disc in the drive. Swapped it for the BluRay and everything works perfectly.

Not sure why it had such an issue with the DVD backup...

Edit: v1.8.5, Korora Linux 19, x64, GNOME. BluRay + DVD + Digital bought from Amazon US.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is exactly my story.

DVD produced the following output:

MakeMKV v1.8.5 darwin(x86-release) started
Debug logging enabled, log will be saved as /Users/onefastskater/MakeMKV_log.txt
Optical drive "BD-RE MATSHITA BD-MLT UJ240AS 1.11" opened in DASPI v1.3 mode.
Using direct disc access mode
IFO file for VTS #4 is corrupt, VOB file must be scanned. This may take very long time, please be patient.
Title #2 has length of 2 seconds which is less than minimum title length of 60 seconds and was therefore skipped
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #5 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #6 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #7 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #8 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #9 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #10 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #11 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #19 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #20 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #21 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #22 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #23 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #30 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #31 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #32 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #33 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #34 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #35 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #36 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #37 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #38 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #39 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #40 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #41 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #49 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #50 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #51 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #52 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #53 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #54 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #55 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #56 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #57 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #58 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #59 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #60 was added (34 cell(s), 2:11:47)
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #61 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #62 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #63 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #74 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #75 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #76 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #77 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #78 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #79 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #80 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Cells 36-end were skipped due to cell commands (structure protection?)
Title #81 declared length is 2:11:47 while its real length is 1:03:54 - assuming fake title
Title #88 was added (9 cell(s), 0:09:39)
Title #89 was added (6 cell(s), 0:05:36)
Title #90 was added (13 cell(s), 0:09:39)
Title #91 was added (9 cell(s), 0:05:36)
Title #92 was added (1 cell(s), 0:01:31)
Operation successfully completed
jcwillia1
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 11:27 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by jcwillia1 »

Did this ever get resolved?
Lovely Rita
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:29 pm

Re: Star Trek Into Darkness BluRay

Post by Lovely Rita »

jcwillia1 wrote:
Mon Aug 20, 2018 12:41 am
Did this ever get resolved?
Which part?
This is the BluRay forum however in this thread you have reports on both the BluRay and DVD.
I, for one, had no issues with the BluRay.
Registered User :wink:
Buy MakeMKV
Post Reply