Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Discussion of LibreDrive mode, compatible drives and firmwares
Post Reply
Maniac
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:36 pm

Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by Maniac »

Hi,

I want to flash my drive to enable LibreDrive. It's a Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11.

But now I'm unsure which firmware to take. In the mk-firmware-pack I can see something which could match in the old folder HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_BU40N-BN11-0M00300-211711201351.bin
In the HL-DT-ST I don't see something that matches with BN11. In this thread viewtopic.php?t=21544 I found something for BN12, but since I'm still unsure if this fits (and if BN11 is a firmware or hardware revision) I didn't flashed it yet

Which firmware should I flash?

Code: Select all

Drive Information
OS device name: /dev/sr0
Manufacturer: BUFFALO
Product: Optical Drive
Revision: BN11
Serial number: 
Firmware date: 2117-11-20 13:51
Bus encryption flags: 1F
Highest AACS version: 68

LibreDrive Information
Status: Possible (with patched firmware)
Drive platform: MT1959
Harware support: Yes
Firmware support: No
Firmware type: Original (patched version available)
Firmware version: 0.BN110
DVD all regions: Possible (with patched firmware)
BD raw data read: Possible (with patched firmware)
BD raw metadata read: Possible (with patched firmware)
Unrestricted read speed: Possible (with patched firmware)
Overlap3470
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2026 9:38 am

Re: Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by Overlap3470 »

Same drive here, and same question.

Which Firmware to flash?

Maybe DE_Buffalo_BRUHD-PU3_BU10.bin to stay on the Buffalo line?

Or DE_LG_BU40N_1.00.bin?

Laufwerksinformation
OS-Gerätename: H:
Produzent: BUFFALO
Produkt: Optical Drive
Revision: BN11
Serienummer:
Firmware-Datum: 2117-11-20 13:51
Markierungen der Bus-Verschlüsselung: 1F
Highest AACS version: 72

LibreDrive Information
Status: Possible (with patched firmware)
Drive platform: MT1959
Harware support: Yes
Firmware support: No
Firmware type: Original (patched version available)
Firmware version: 0.BN110
DVD all regions: Possible (with patched firmware)
BD raw data read: Possible (with patched firmware)
BD raw metadata read: Possible (with patched firmware)
Unrestricted read speed: Possible (with patched firmware)
Sayaka
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:00 pm

Re: Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by Sayaka »

The correct answer : you are using Windows, so when in doubt you should probably be e-mailing Billycar11 (memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=15044) for an auto flasher or purchasing an auto flasher from MartyMcNuts here : https://payhip.com/b/MyeJ9

The "I feel like trusting Sayaka" answer : I should point out that I do not fully know what I am doing with this drive and firmware version, but I know enough that I can hopefully tell you a way to attempt this that shouldn't brick your drive. No warranty and no refunds, though. :)

Get MartyMcNuts's SDFTool Flasher here : viewtopic.php?t=22896

And mike admin's MK firmware pack here : https://www.makemkv.com/download/mk-fir ... 200720.zip

Do a regular WRITE (encryption should likely be unticked I believe; also, no bootloader flash and no RECOVER either) with SDFTool Flasher with the following firmware : HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_BU40N-BN11-0M00300-211711201351.bin from the folder named "old" inside the MK firmware pack.

This should be enough to enable LibreDrive. If you have trouble reading discs afterwards, particularly UHD discs, you should then flash DE_LG_BU40N_1.00.bin from MartyMcNuts's All You Need Firmware Pack (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HRnbXi ... sp=sharing) with a regular WRITE without encryption.

EDIT : Clarified something.
Overlap3470
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2026 9:38 am

Re: Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by Overlap3470 »

Thanks, Sayaka, I did it :)

The original BN11 is a decrypted firmware.

used SDF Toll Flasher 1.3.6

Form original bn11 to HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_BU40N-BN11-0M00300-211711201351.bin
simple write, no recover. I'm not sure if you'll need this step if you go for an bu40 1.00 or bu40 1.03mk after that.

HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_BU40N-BN11-0M00300-211711201351.bin will not read UHD Discs, But Libre is enabled.

Then I flashed to DE_LG_BU40N_1.00.bin, like the first one, no recover just simply write.

DE_LG_BU40N_1.00.bin will read UHD Discs and Libre is enabled.
Sayaka
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:00 pm

Re: Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by Sayaka »

Thanks, Sayaka, I did it :)
You're welcome ! I am glad I could help.
The original BN11 is a decrypted firmware.
I thought it might be, as the "2117" firmware date kind of gave it away.
I'm not sure if you'll need this step if you go for an bu40 1.00 or bu40 1.03mk after that.
I am not sure either, but I thought it was best to play it safe. :)
HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_BU40N-BN11-0M00300-211711201351.bin will not read UHD Discs, But Libre is enabled.

Then I flashed to DE_LG_BU40N_1.00.bin, like the first one, no recover just simply write.

DE_LG_BU40N_1.00.bin will read UHD Discs and Libre is enabled.
You are not the first person to report this. Thank you for this, it's nice to have the confirmation that merely flashing to the BU40N-BN11-MK firmware isn't enough.
tomty89
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:48 am

Re: Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by tomty89 »

Overlap3470 wrote: Wed Jul 22, 2026 9:42 am Form original bn11 to HL-DT-ST-BD-RE_BU40N-BN11-0M00300-211711201351.bin
simple write, no recover. I'm not sure if you'll need this step if you go for an bu40 1.00 or bu40 1.03mk after that.
Billycar11 wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 5:20 am BU40N on any Firmware directly to > BU40N 1.03MK

WP/BP50NB40 to > BP50NB40-NB50-1.03MK then to > BP60NB10 1.02MK or 1.00MK
NB52 to > BP50NB40-NB50-1.03MK with enc > BP50NB40-NB50-1.03MK with bootloader/full flash > BP60NB10 1.00_HBD from Marty download/file.php?id=2143
if using command line add "full" after rawflash
Apparently an immediate step is only necessary when the ultimate goal is to crossflash into a different model.

Not so sure about 1.00 though, but maybe it would also work as long as it's DE-patched (instead of the literal vanilla stock). Also I think the worst case is just that the firmware will be rejected / "nothing happened".
Sayaka
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2026 3:00 pm

Re: Which firmware for Buffalo BRXL-PT6U2VB-EU BN11

Post by Sayaka »

tomty89 wrote: Apparently an immediate step is only necessary when the ultimate goal is to crossflash into a different model.
I'm not sure about that. If it's an OEM drive, it looks like the additional step may also be necessary when you need to "sidegrade", which AFAIK is not quite the same as a crossflash :
Billycar11 wrote:LG 1.04+ / BU40N 1.03 / Asus 3.10+ and similar
The newer OEM firmwares cannot be flashed easily due to the additional downgrade checks implemented by the drive/firmware manufacturer. If your drive has one of these firmwares, and there is no MK version of the same firmware/drive model or higher number, you will have to sidegrade to Asus 3.10MK (for compatible ASUS 5.25 drives ONLY) or (LG WH16NS60 1.02MK for compatible LG 5.25) or (BU40N 1.03MK LG Slim drives ONLY) respectively. (Note: MK firmware is available for firmware versions mentioned above.) Keeping the flashing of firmware in these scenarios within their respective family of drives/firmware (e.g ASUS firmware for ASUS drives and LG firmware for LG drives) at this stage of flashing. Then afterwards if that initial flash is successful you can move to different firmware respectively if you would like a different and compatible firmware version for the drive in question.
Hence why I flashed BU40N-1.03MK on my Buffalo BRXL-PUS6U3B-US (BN14) before flashing BU40N-1.00. What I do not know is whether this "issue" has something to do with the more recent, encrypted firmware, or whether it's a separate issue entirely.
tomty89 wrote:Also I think the worst case is just that the firmware will be rejected / "nothing happened".
Probably true. Seriously "hurting" a drive with makemkvcon f/sdftool seems unlikely, unless the person is doing it on purpose or truly doesn't know what they're doing.

EDIT : Rephrased to avoid confusion.
Post Reply