if the graph is a straight line (like the Harry Potter movies), then it has static trims and you can discard the original RPU and use the cmv4.0 generated one.


So this Se7en framestore release with DoVi cm4.0 is actually better in terms of quality when compared with the HDR10 cm2.9 uhd retail bluray ?
Well, 92% of the movie is under 600nits so pretty much all the TVs will be able to display it without tone mapping.

Thanks a lot for your reply!RESET_9999 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 4:19 pmWell, 92% of the movie is under 600nits so pretty much all the TVs will be able to display it without tone mapping.
It shouldn't look much different than HDR10 playback unless you have a very low brightness TV/PJ.
The trim has a positive lift over 0.0025(2100) for the whole movie but it is ignored by all the HDMI devices.
![]()
Thanks for the answer. That clarifies a lot for me.RESET_9999 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 4:11 pmWhen 6-4 creates trims plot graph image(s), then yes your input contains trims...
if the graph is a straight line (like the Harry Potter movies), then it has static trims and you can discard the original RPU and use the cmv4.0 generated one.
![]()
Yes, the ugoos supports DV + FEL(LLDV) on any display (SDR/HDR10).
All the original/retail CMV4.0 rpu will have L2.However when I plot a cmv4.0 there are no L2 trims being created but the L1 Plot list it.
SamuriHL wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:36 amHave you had a chance to test Davinci 19.x to see if it's still necessary to decode to prores first? Has their hevc support improved at all? I finally was able to fix my Davinci working with their support and I want to start playing with DV conversions soon. Thanks!
Good to know thanks. Prores it is then.RESET_9999 wrote:Yes, I tested hevc decoding not a long time ago and it still drops frames.
Try the Spears and Munsil demo clip, it drops frames almost instantly with the mkv container. If you remux it to mp4, the SM clip will work but it is still not 100% reliable.
SamuriHL wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:36 amHave you had a chance to test Davinci 19.x to see if it's still necessary to decode to prores first? Has their hevc support improved at all? I finally was able to fix my Davinci working with their support and I want to start playing with DV conversions soon. Thanks!
So do we have to re-generate to a higher mastering display (based on 6.2 measuremnts) or just edit L6?RESET_9999 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:12 amPS, to those who generate DV...
I said a couple of times that I selected the mastering display luminance based on the content's actual brightness(measured in 6-2).
I said to use 1000nits MDL if 90%+ of the shots have highlights under 1000nits.
Well, this is not longer the right thing to do because I recently discovered that some players like the Ugoos, Oppo, x700, X800m2 will clip highlights if the content is brighter than the RPU mastering display luminance, regardless of the metadata. So it may not be a good idea after all to use 1000nits MDL even if there are only a few highlights brighter than 1000nits because they will be clipped if your TV is not capable of displaying this brightness.
If you use a Oppo, X800m2 , x700 or Ugoos and the content has highlights brighter than 1000nits, it should be generated again. L6 is useless.darrrkmanxxx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:32 pmSo do we have to re-generate to a higher mastering display (based on 6.2 measuremnts) or just edit L6?
alright thanks for the answer!RESET_9999 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:14 pmIf you use a Oppo, X800m2 , x700 or Ugoos and the content has highlights brighter than 1000nits, it should be generated again. L6 is useless.darrrkmanxxx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:32 pmSo do we have to re-generate to a higher mastering display (based on 6.2 measuremnts) or just edit L6?