Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

Please post here for issues related to UHD discs
Message
Author

DylanValenti
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2020 9:42 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10352 Post by DylanValenti » Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:12 am

RESET_9999 wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2024 2:42 am
idk, did you install avisynthplus ?
https://github.com/AviSynth/AviSynthPlu ... redist.exe
Yep. Just reinstalled to verify. Still no screenshots

RESET_9999
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:12 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10353 Post by RESET_9999 » Fri Sep 20, 2024 11:04 am

idk , works fine for me. Try in manual mode, go into the temp folder and try to play the .avs script in avspmod, it will tell you the error.

DylanValenti
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2020 9:42 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10354 Post by DylanValenti » Fri Sep 20, 2024 4:11 pm

It says "Cannot load file 'Z:/01DoVi/tools/avs_libplacebo.dll'. Platform returned code 126: The specified module could not be found. (Z:\01DoVi\temp.folder25\9_FEL.avs, line 2)"

I checked my tools folder and avs_libplacebo.dll is indeed in the root. Any suggestions?

RESET_9999
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:12 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10355 Post by RESET_9999 » Fri Sep 20, 2024 4:45 pm

no idea, works fine for me but i just noticed that there is an issue with the HDR10 Base layer SDR tone-mapped screenshots in that workflow which is unrelated to your issue and is now fixed in latest beta. Anyway, I dont see the point in comparing HDR images in SDR(this is not lossless). The script outputs proper HDR metadata for the HDR screenshots which can be viewed in HDR (or mapped to SDR) on Chrome/Edge/Opera browser. EG: https://slow.pics/c/bTBjYZuB Also, ffms2 for my screenshots workflow (7-1) is quite slow so not really usable IMO. When you encode in 8-2-1, it's fine.


Image

staknhalo
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 12:05 am

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10356 Post by staknhalo » Fri Sep 20, 2024 5:52 pm

staknhalo wrote:
Mon Sep 16, 2024 8:50 pm
Here's a DV profile 4? (SDR HEVC BL?) file I came across from someone linking on Plex forums:

Image

https://mega.nz/file/QGRwQQQB#_3ErgcM5Y ... UTE8eau8Tc
I'm removing this, MEGA started throttling my account ever since I posted it lol - I can't download my 8K movie trailers that get posted to MEGA because of 'account usage' 😭

Edit: It's from here - the 'LG' one IIRC - https://www.demolandia.net/4k-video-tes ... age-2.html

RESET_9999
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:12 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10357 Post by RESET_9999 » Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:05 pm

Yeah, I have speed issues with MEGA all the time. I hate it.

skull88
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2023 3:08 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10358 Post by skull88 » Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:10 pm

FWIW, when that happens to me, I just briefly turn on VPN and it seems to usually let the file download fast again, at least with JDownloader2 and a paid MEGA account. Cheers.

staknhalo
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 12:05 am

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10359 Post by staknhalo » Fri Sep 20, 2024 9:18 pm

skull88 wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:10 pm
a paid MEGA account
Image

Image

Appreciate the tip though :P

DylanValenti
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2020 9:42 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10360 Post by DylanValenti » Sat Sep 21, 2024 5:38 am

After updating to the newest scripts release, I'm also noticing that the metafier always says incorrect file name range syntax even though I'm not using any special characters at all. Any suggestions?

RESET_9999
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:12 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10361 Post by RESET_9999 » Sat Sep 21, 2024 12:43 pm

DylanValenti wrote:
Sat Sep 21, 2024 5:38 am
After updating to the newest scripts release, I'm also noticing that the metafier always says incorrect file name range syntax even though I'm not using any special characters at all. Any suggestions?
Example of your filename and path, please?

staknhalo
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 12:05 am

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10362 Post by staknhalo » Sat Sep 21, 2024 6:19 pm

RESET_9999 wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2024 4:45 pm
no idea, works fine for me but i just noticed that there is an issue with the HDR10 Base layer SDR tone-mapped screenshots in that workflow which is unrelated to your issue and is now fixed in latest beta. Anyway, I dont see the point in comparing HDR images in SDR(this is not lossless). The script outputs proper HDR metadata for the HDR screenshots which can be viewed in HDR (or mapped to SDR) on Chrome/Edge/Opera browser. EG: https://slow.pics/c/bTBjYZuB Also, ffms2 for my screenshots workflow (7-1) is quite slow so not really usable IMO. When you encode in 8-2-1, it's fine.


Image
I use this (Microsoft Store) app on Windows for viewing HDR screenshots, I like it:

https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9pgn3 ... n-US&gl=US

RESET_9999
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:12 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10363 Post by RESET_9999 » Sat Sep 21, 2024 7:08 pm

staknhalo wrote:
Sat Sep 21, 2024 6:19 pm
I use this (Microsoft Store) app on Windows for viewing HDR screenshots, I like it:
https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9pgn3 ... n-US&gl=US
Thanks but It looks like it doesn't handle my HDR png images correctly, the black levels are wrong. Probably because they are full-range RGB.
Windows Photo App and the slow.pics/comparison website and madVR display my RGB HDR png images properly.
https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9wzdn ... n-US&gl=US

LV8HD
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:48 pm

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10364 Post by LV8HD » Sun Sep 22, 2024 2:49 pm

Why is MaxCLL calculated with DaVinci Resolve so different than MadVR? What is the most accurate?

DaVinci:
Image

MadVR:
Image

morbius
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:17 am

Re: Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

#10365 Post by morbius » Mon Sep 23, 2024 11:36 am

I've converted several HDR10 titles to DV using the 6-2 and 3-1 workflows and have been pleased with the results. With 6-2 I've been selecting "n" for exclude letterbox for estimating MaxFALL due to the warning about processing time. To what extent might this impact the end result? I only want to convert my library once, so don't want to take short-cuts if they are undermining final quality.

Post Reply