MDL is usually a good indication but you cant only rely on it... The only way to be sure is by plotting DV and HDR10 or exporting screenshots with the dovi bakerdapope wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2023 12:41 amThanks for the new tools @RESET_1999. Can't wait to try them out.
But first I want to check that I am correctly diagnosing when files have brightness expanded via FEL layer.
First we have Mission Impossible: Fallout: https://slow.pics/GmtF2CDS/
This FEL file shows a maximum display luminance of 1000 nits in mediainfo, however here it is 4000. We can see the file actually reaches 4000 nits as well in the MaxCLL. So this would be an example of brightness expanded via FEL layer, correct?
Next is Carrie (1976): https://slow.pics/ynAwxGW9/
This is also FEL. Both mediainfo and this graph with RPU/L6 show mastering display luminance as 1000 nits. So this would be an example of a title where the brightness is NOT expanded via FEL?
Note that Mission Impossible: Fallout is not included on your list. But also, for sanity's sake, it would be great to keep track of which titles DON'T have expanded brightness via FEL layer, along with those that do.
Thank you so much for your help!
EDIT: had a look and FEL does expand the brightness like all the other MI
https://slow.pics/c/x2MdG2tX