Dear RESET_9999. Thank you very much for trying to help me. But I can't
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Is it possible to convert Profile 8 to Profile 7 st-dl? (Blu-ray UHD standart).
Dear RESET_9999. Thank you very much for trying to help me. But I can't
If i take a mkv 7 profile dolby vision then i mux it in tsmuxer and then gonna play it in x800m2 sony player from usb, do i get truly dolby vision with all subtitles and all languages which was in previous mkv 7 profele dolby vision ?
no, and st-dl is not bluray standard
yes, see the link in my signature for what the x800m2 support or not
For L6 DV yes: workflow 2-1-1
Hi , is it possible to mux with your script MKV 7 PROFILE DOLVY VISION toRESET_9999 wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 6:27 pmFor L6 DV yes: workflow 2-1-1
For the BL: no, not with my script.
Yes you can remove the DV metadata/layer with 6-1-2 but you will have to mux the new HEVC file to MKV yourself with mkvtoolnix.
So with Tool its possible to remove DV metadata , is there a way to convert that DV metadata to HDR10+ metadata ?RESET_9999 wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 12:09 pmYes you can remove the DV metadata/layer with 6-1-2 but you will have to mux the new HEVC file to MKV yourself with mkvtoolnix.
You use the original profile 7 RPU for DoViBaker.NiCE77 wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 6:24 am@RESET_9999
Can you give me some guidance on DoViBaker?
Let's assume this is the starting script:
bl=DGSource("blclip.dgi")
el=DGSource("elclip.dgi")
DoViBaker(bl,el,rpu="RPU.bin")
If I recompress this with e.g. Handbrake, I get a 10 bit HEVC HDR10 stream containing the FEL data, to which I can add the RPU converted to Profile 8 with dovi_tool.
So why does DoViBaker need the RPU?
In this case, in which mode should the RPU be converted to P8 (preserving mapping or not)?
Thanks, but I found this comment: https://github.com/erazortt/DoViBaker/i ... 1259843741quietvoid wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:34 amYou use the original profile 7 RPU for DoViBaker.NiCE77 wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 6:24 am@RESET_9999
Can you give me some guidance on DoViBaker?
Let's assume this is the starting script:
bl=DGSource("blclip.dgi")
el=DGSource("elclip.dgi")
DoViBaker(bl,el,rpu="RPU.bin")
If I recompress this with e.g. Handbrake, I get a 10 bit HEVC HDR10 stream containing the FEL data, to which I can add the RPU converted to Profile 8 with dovi_tool.
So why does DoViBaker need the RPU?
In this case, in which mode should the RPU be converted to P8 (preserving mapping or not)?
And for the encode you convert to profile 8.1 (mode 2).
You have to be careful with DoViBaker as it outputs RGB by default, and a later conversion could make the colours wrong when encoding.
Reinjecting the *original* RPU is wrong. When converted to profile 8.1 it is fine.NiCE77 wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:55 amThanks, but I found this comment: https://github.com/erazortt/DoViBaker/i ... 1259843741
So the result will not be good if we inject the RPU because double processing. But then I don't really understand what this tool is for?
Many thanks!quietvoid wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 11:03 amReinjecting the *original* RPU is wrong. When converted to profile 8.1 it is fine.NiCE77 wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:55 amThanks, but I found this comment: https://github.com/erazortt/DoViBaker/i ... 1259843741
So the result will not be good if we inject the RPU because double processing. But then I don't really understand what this tool is for?
As long as you don't tonemap using the trims in DoViBaker.
DoViBaker uses the mapping metadata and NLQ metadata to reconstruct the FEL image.
All this metadata is removed by profile 8.1 conversion (for FEL).
What would be a good FFMPEG command line to create the new base layer with as close to lossless quality as possible? I am playing with two at the moment, but not sure if those are the best options if I want to focus on quality.quietvoid wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 11:03 amReinjecting the *original* RPU is wrong. When converted to profile 8.1 it is fine.NiCE77 wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:55 amThanks, but I found this comment: https://github.com/erazortt/DoViBaker/i ... 1259843741
So the result will not be good if we inject the RPU because double processing. But then I don't really understand what this tool is for?
As long as you don't tonemap using the trims in DoViBaker.
DoViBaker uses the mapping metadata and NLQ metadata to reconstruct the FEL image.
All this metadata is removed by profile 8.1 conversion (for FEL).