Dolby Vision now possible through MP4 Mux.

[lexyz]

sorry, it's been years since this was released. don't have a source at hand, simply google... you'll find posts, blogs etc...

Do you suggest me to search for a proof for your statement? Really?
I would rather not spend time on this misconception.

[daddy]

Hello everyone,

first I wanted to say a big THANK YOU to everyone so dedicated to get the DV playback riddle solved, first of all to yusesope, whose tool I've tried to use.

I've just had one UDH Bluray Disc (MI: Fallout), which I tried to get to run in DV after ripping it. With the help of yusesope's tool I was able to create an mp4 file which my LG OLED65GX9LA liked to play. I used the software and procedure described on p199 in this forum:

- ffmpeg to demux from BD m2ts file
- MUX_AND_CONVERT_TO_PROFILE_81.bat
- mp4muxer to get an .mp4 file

The file triggered DV on my LG TV, but I am not sure if it displayed the content correctly. That's why I would like to ask you more experienced people to take a look at my photo comparison (DSLR in manual mode). From left to right you see:

- MKV ripped with 1.15.3 from BD disc, played on my HiMedia Q10 Pro (which plays the file only in HDR10)
- same file, but played from my LG OLED65GX9LA with internal player via DLNA (which also plays it in HDR10)
- mp4-File created with the above procedure, played from my LG's internal player with active DV

Bildschirmfoto 2020-12-12 um 19.55.51.jpg

To me, the colors look quite different compared to the HDR10 variants of the movie. I do not have a hardware BD-UHD player to see how the movie would look like when played from there :-/

What are your thoughts on this?
In my expectation the colors should not differ between HDR10 and DV, right?

The EL is a 10-bit video bitstream that carries the residual between the source and the BL and the “dynamic” metadata for DV. An enhancement layer that carries a residual signal is = 0 (zero), that is, the decoder does not need to process the residual signal, is called minimum enhancement layer (MEL). If the residual signal is > 0, it is called full enhancement layer (FEL)

MI Fallout is a FEL Dolby Vision movie. (BL + EL (>0) + RPU)
Making DV files in single layer profile works only with MEL (EL=0).
The only correct method to have dual layers files (or dual tracks of single layer) is with mp4muxer with Dolby Vision in profile 7.

[agneva]

Did you try the ape?

[pete19]

Do you suggest me to search for a proof for your statement? Really?
I would rather not spend time on this misconception.

you don't seriously think anybody here will spend more time educating about something that you've not done your research for.

but you can always "believe" what you want

like I said, this is years old. You spread misinformation, I'm sure not on purpose.

two main things about DV that are the reasons it is the premiere HDR format:
(1) ability to fully re-create the 12bit 422 master at home in FEL dual layer releases
(2) dynamic metadata

[quietvoid]

you don't seriously think anybody here will spend more time educating about something that you've not done your research for.

but you can always "believe" what you want

like I said, this is years old. You spread misinformation, I'm sure not on purpose.

two main things about DV that are the reasons it is the premiere HDR format:
(1) ability to fully re-create the 12bit 422 master at home in FEL dual layer releases
(2) dynamic metadata

You're the only one posting conflicting statements without providing proof.

As I've mentioned already:

420 is not wrong, the patent specs also only mention 12 bit YCbCr 420 reconstructed output.
As for the HDMI transmission, it is detailed as 12 bit YCbCr 422 because the metadata is also transported into the least significant bits.

No where is there a mention that the output video is actually 12 bit 422.

There's no place for full 4:2:2 video:

[Manixx2020beyound]

C006C359-D5D4-4621-B8B6-27FC3EDF7B99.png (687.86 KiB) Viewed 14804 times

05A0F454-1A78-430E-BD42-5F969372BDDC.png (444.74 KiB) Viewed 14804 times

Might be some confusion where the mezzanine is concern.

[pete19]

420 is not wrong, the patent specs also only mention 12 bit YCbCr 420 reconstructed output.
As for the HDMI transmission, it is detailed as 12 bit YCbCr 422 because the metadata is also transported into the least significant bits.

first off, nobody said 420 is "wrong" - that is your wording. 420 simply has less color resolution, hence 422 is more desirable.

Second, both STD and LLDV output a 12bit 422 signal yet only STD contains in addition the dynamic metadata because it's tv-led. so the player-led stream (already DV decoded) which also contains 12bit 422 signal requires less bandwidth, hence it provides low latency...

again, BOTH DV stream types contain 12bit 422 signal (because that's the Dolby spec), yet LLDV has less data than the other... only STD carries metadata in the stream, not LLDV.... hence your 2nd statement is also wrong.

to recap:
all DV streams are 12 bit 422.
only tv-led contains the full dynamic metadata, so full stream requirements, hence RGB tunneling in 8bit float container is used.
player-led requires less bandwidth because it contains less data (still 12 bit 422 signal).
MEL is also 12 bit 422 but only contains a 10bit 420 signal, padded.

and to stress this part:

because the metadata is also transported into the least significant bits.

you make it sound like that "explains" a 12bit 420 final output. no, the metadata allows to reconstruct the full 12bit 422 master, which is why it is a 12bit 422 signal.

if final output was 12bit 420 (so EL only contains luminance, Y difference) for FEL STD, they wouldn't need a 12 bit 422 stream, they'd use a 12bit 420 stream. Metadata is the mere difference, it doesn't need "extra" space on top of the difference, especially since it's encoded as well.

[DaMacFunkin]

I’m off to get some popcorn for round 2, this is freakin’ awesome

[pete19]

I’m off to get some popcorn for round 2, this is freakin’ awesome

you want more ? here is an encore...

most folks here are forgetting that 12bit 422 ONLY ever comes into play for profile 7 FEL - not even profile 7 MEL (10bit 420).

All the gazillion other DV profiles are all 420 drained sauce for streaming. THIS is easily 90+% of DV content.

Then, for disc releases (--> profile 7), (unfortunately) the majority of releases are MEL... so 12bit 422 (--> p7 FEL) only rarely ever comes into play.

This may be another reason why in the many Dolby docs this is not explicitly stated, to not confuse content creators who in 9/10 cases will use single DV layer BL (for garbage compressed streaming), and even if authoring disc deliverables, then often use MEL.

Even some of the largest disc releases do not get DV or DV FEL (--> SW, only EVIII from Ryan Johnson is DV, but MEL). There are authoring issues with FEL when one gets into the 2nd and 3rd layers on the UHD disc, so that seems to be another huge obstacle.

again: p7 FEL tv-led is as good as it gets right now.

[pete19]

and here's more...

there are only two (2) DV streams:

1) 8bit RGB via tunneling (for STD tv-led, as it contains both BL+EL data)
2) 12bit 422 for everything else (LLDV player-led, MEL, or single layer profiles)

IF (!) the actual max chroma subsampling was 420, then the 2nd stream variant above would only need to be 12bit 420 - there would be no need to use 12bit 422 (+ HDCP, hence you'd never use more bandwidth than needed).

MEL is just 10bit 420 anyways, all single layer profiles as well.
IF (!) profile 7 LLDV was 12bit 420 for FEL releases you could just use a 12bit 420 stream as LLDV carries no metadata (DV was already encoded by player).

But they specc'ed a 12bit 422 stream as LLDV for p7 FEL is a 12bit 422 signal.

[Pacer]

Hello everyone,

first I wanted to say a big THANK YOU to everyone so dedicated to get the DV playback riddle solved, first of all to yusesope, whose tool I've tried to use.

I've just had one UDH Bluray Disc (MI: Fallout), which I tried to get to run in DV after ripping it. With the help of yusesope's tool I was able to create an mp4 file which my LG OLED65GX9LA liked to play. I used the software and procedure described on p199 in this forum:

- ffmpeg to demux from BD m2ts file
- MUX_AND_CONVERT_TO_PROFILE_81.bat
- mp4muxer to get an .mp4 file

The file triggered DV on my LG TV, but I am not sure if it displayed the content correctly. That's why I would like to ask you more experienced people to take a look at my photo comparison (DSLR in manual mode). From left to right you see:

- MKV ripped with 1.15.3 from BD disc, played on my HiMedia Q10 Pro (which plays the file only in HDR10)
- same file, but played from my LG OLED65GX9LA with internal player via DLNA (which also plays it in HDR10)
- mp4-File created with the above procedure, played from my LG's internal player with active DV

Bildschirmfoto 2020-12-12 um 19.55.51.jpg

To me, the colors look quite different compared to the HDR10 variants of the movie. I do not have a hardware BD-UHD player to see how the movie would look like when played from there :-/

What are your thoughts on this?
In my expectation the colors should not differ between HDR10 and DV, right?

The EL is a 10-bit video bitstream that carries the residual between the source and the BL and the “dynamic” metadata for DV. An enhancement layer that carries a residual signal is = 0 (zero), that is, the decoder does not need to process the residual signal, is called minimum enhancement layer (MEL). If the residual signal is > 0, it is called full enhancement layer (FEL)

MI Fallout is a FEL Dolby Vision movie. (BL + EL (>0) + RPU)
Making DV files in single layer profile works only with MEL (EL=0).
The only correct method to have dual layers files (or dual tracks of single layer) is with mp4muxer with Dolby Vision in profile 7.

Interesting. Your statement stands in contrast to what Yusesope has written in his post:

UPDATE 02/10/20
I added the possibility to "convert" a UHD-BD (MEL or FEL, it doesn't matter) into a profile 8.1 file (Single Track Single Layer)

2. UHD-BD TO PROFILE 8.1
You can use both UHD-BD MEL and FEL

Can you explain, why this should not be possible with this tool?

Thanks a lot!
Pacer

[MastaG]

So which players are capable of playing FEL remuxes from network sources (Plex/Emby/SMB), e.g. the full deal retaining the 12bit 4000nits final picture like when playing the original disc?
e.g. remuxed into a TS or MKV container so I can add a high def audio track?

[shawnc22]

So which players are capable of playing FEL remuxes from network sources (Plex/Emby/SMB), e.g. the full deal retaining the 12bit 4000nits final picture like when playing the original disc?
e.g. remuxed into a TS or MKV container so I can add a high def audio track?

From network? The oppo and that's it.

[pete19]

So which players are capable of playing FEL remuxes from network sources (Plex/Emby/SMB), e.g. the full deal retaining the 12bit 4000nits final picture like when playing the original disc?
e.g. remuxed into a TS or MKV container so I can add a high def audio track?

Oppo with (free) Russian firmware hack can do all of that. And you can mux to m2ts or BDMV folder structure and it'll play it (and keep HD audio). As long as you don't trim the movie, tsmuxer creates a perfect DV mux.

[aboulfad]

Hi,
Can someone elaborate on yusesope´s comment copied below. Would (and how) DV streaming providers (NF, Apple) have to deal with the lack of EL in a DV profile 5 and potential « issues » such as chromatic aberrations. Or are those issues a side effect of yusesope method for creating a single track single layer DV media ?

One point that seems not so obvious, is that a Profile 5 can make use of dynamic metadata carried in the RPU- Reference Processing Unit, what is this? Thank you.

If instead I choose to play my files with the profiles dvhe.05 and dvhe.08 ..., the hardware decoder will try to process the Base Layer (BL) and to improve it through RPU metadata by discarding the EL layer.
however, the Base Layer is non-standard (it has a different color space than the IPTPQc2/IPT one) as extracted from a Bluray disk.
It should appear better than an HDR stream (since metadata is dynamic and non-static) but will not reach its maximum splendor due to the lack of data contained in the EL layer.
The lack of this information, however, could lead, in some cases, to evident chromatic aberrations.