BD Bridget Jones Baby

Please post here for issues related to Blu-ray discs
Post Reply
mymkv
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:19 am

BD Bridget Jones Baby

Post by mymkv » Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:12 pm

Hello.

Whats the meaning of 402!* Main Movies on this BD?
All have Different Segment Numbers.

Thx.

(* Mac BD Software Player showing)

Woodstock
Posts: 10333
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:21 pm

Re: BD Bridget Jones Baby

Post by Woodstock » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:14 pm

Do a search for "lionsgate" and "obfuscation", and you'll get an idea. All but one is a fake title to throw you off.

If you have the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) from Oracle installed on your computer, MakeMKV will attempt to narrow the selection down.

mymkv
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:19 am

Re: BD Bridget Jones Baby

Post by mymkv » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:50 pm

Woodstock wrote:Do a search for "lionsgate" and "obfuscation", and you'll get an idea. All but one is a fake title to throw you off.

If you have the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) from Oracle installed on your computer, MakeMKV will attempt to narrow the selection down.
Java is installed But Many titles in makemkv list .
For me its the First BD with These behavior.
I ripped the First one. And its ok i think.

weisnet
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 6:54 pm

Re: BD Bridget Jones Baby

Post by weisnet » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:28 pm

Hi. Any Idea witch is the right PLS?

zonk0101
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat May 30, 2020 10:14 am

Re: BD Bridget Jones Baby

Post by zonk0101 » Sat May 30, 2020 10:20 am

Its been a long time, but it looks like MakeMKV still has problem selecting the correct track.
As suggested at
https://forum.redfox.bz/threads/bridget ... ckt.72114/
I've taken Playlist 212 / 00212.mpls and as of my wife it is correct now.

This is the Segment-Order: 515,517,505,514,516,500,518,513,507,509,511,508,510,503,512,502,504,501,519,506

mgutt
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun May 05, 2019 6:38 pm

Re: BD Bridget Jones Baby

Post by mgutt » Wed May 05, 2021 11:13 am

Verified with DVDFab Player. Yes, 212 is correct.
2021-05-05 13_13_00.png
2021-05-05 13_13_00.png (170.12 KiB) Viewed 7179 times

Post Reply