HDR colour profile support on Mac
Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:44 pm
I've noticed differences in the labelling of colour profiles between some UHD movies I acquired from the inter-webs and those I ripped myself with MKV and Handbrake.
For the ones I downloaded, the metadata lists the colour profile as BT.2020 PQ (9-16-9), and for the one I ripped myself it's stated as BT.2020 HDR10 (9-16-9). Further, macOS recognises the one I ripped as HDR, but appears not to for the other ones; or at least isn't labelling them as such. I base this on QuickView displaying an HDR tag on the movie I ripped (see screenshot) when it doesn't do so for the others with BT.2020 PQ (9-16-9).
So my questions are: is BT.2020 PQ (9-16-9) the same as BT.2020 HDR10 (9-16-9)? If so, is there a way to correct or change the labelling or naming scheme in the metadata so that it's supported? If not, is there any way to convert between the two without a full transcode? Or were the ones I downloaded simply sourced from an HDR UHD but converted to SDR during a transcode? That doesn't seem likely for some reason, but who knows? Or is the presence of the tag a cosmetic that isn't related to support or playback and is merely complimentary?
I'm blown away with the UHD I ripped and its appearance in macOS even though I don't have an HDR screen. It still looks far more dynamic than any SDR content I've seen on the laptop, and so the support in macOS for HDR10 at least seems pretty good. Other software don't appear to be doing a very good job, likely because they're not targeting Apple hardware or assume you're playing back on a fully HDR-compliant TV is my guess (but this is pure speculation).
Any insight on the discrepancy would be appreciated, but this kind of reinforces why it's nearly always better to rip something yourself from the source if you care about doing it right, to the highest standard, or at least to the settings that you prefer.
For the ones I downloaded, the metadata lists the colour profile as BT.2020 PQ (9-16-9), and for the one I ripped myself it's stated as BT.2020 HDR10 (9-16-9). Further, macOS recognises the one I ripped as HDR, but appears not to for the other ones; or at least isn't labelling them as such. I base this on QuickView displaying an HDR tag on the movie I ripped (see screenshot) when it doesn't do so for the others with BT.2020 PQ (9-16-9).
So my questions are: is BT.2020 PQ (9-16-9) the same as BT.2020 HDR10 (9-16-9)? If so, is there a way to correct or change the labelling or naming scheme in the metadata so that it's supported? If not, is there any way to convert between the two without a full transcode? Or were the ones I downloaded simply sourced from an HDR UHD but converted to SDR during a transcode? That doesn't seem likely for some reason, but who knows? Or is the presence of the tag a cosmetic that isn't related to support or playback and is merely complimentary?
I'm blown away with the UHD I ripped and its appearance in macOS even though I don't have an HDR screen. It still looks far more dynamic than any SDR content I've seen on the laptop, and so the support in macOS for HDR10 at least seems pretty good. Other software don't appear to be doing a very good job, likely because they're not targeting Apple hardware or assume you're playing back on a fully HDR-compliant TV is my guess (but this is pure speculation).
Any insight on the discrepancy would be appreciated, but this kind of reinforces why it's nearly always better to rip something yourself from the source if you care about doing it right, to the highest standard, or at least to the settings that you prefer.