Page 1 of 1

Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:23 pm
by exxxx
Hi everyone!

I have an LG 5.25 inch 16x internal drive that I've been using for around 3 or so months with ~400 rips that's starting to fail reading some triple layer UHD's I own.

My original plan was to replace it with a BDR-212DBK (I ordered two of these, one for backup), but I've been looking at getting a BDR-S13E-X instead. What really is the difference between them? Is the S13E really that much quieter/more reliable/faster to justify the price difference? I don't mind spending more for a better product.

Thanks,
exx

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:06 pm
by Coopervid
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:23 pm
Hi everyone!

I have an LG 5.25 inch 16x internal drive that I've been using for around 3 or so months with ~400 rips that's starting to fail reading some triple layer UHD's I own.

My original plan was to replace it with a BDR-212DBK (I ordered two of these, one for backup), but I've been looking at getting a BDR-S13E-X instead. What really is the difference between them? Is the S13E really that much quieter/more reliable/faster to justify the price difference? I don't mind spending more for a better product.

Thanks,
exx
Other people might disagree but i think the 13s are just overpriced compared to the 12s. Pioneer did a lot of yaddayadda to justify the higher prices before they got out of business.

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:32 pm
by exxxx
Coopervid wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:06 pm
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:23 pm
Hi everyone!

I have an LG 5.25 inch 16x internal drive that I've been using for around 3 or so months with ~400 rips that's starting to fail reading some triple layer UHD's I own.

My original plan was to replace it with a BDR-212DBK (I ordered two of these, one for backup), but I've been looking at getting a BDR-S13E-X instead. What really is the difference between them? Is the S13E really that much quieter/more reliable/faster to justify the price difference? I don't mind spending more for a better product.

Thanks,
exx
Other people might disagree but i think the 13s are just overpriced compared to the 12s. Pioneer did a lot of yaddayadda to justify the higher prices before they got out of business.
So this shit is basically a huge ripoff then no? https://shop.uhdfriendlydrives.co.uk/pr ... e-friendly

This is what I ordered two of: https://www.ebay.com/itm/316022359451.

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:41 pm
by asmcom
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:32 pm
Coopervid wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:06 pm
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:23 pm
Hi everyone!

I have an LG 5.25 inch 16x internal drive that I've been using for around 3 or so months with ~400 rips that's starting to fail reading some triple layer UHD's I own.

My original plan was to replace it with a BDR-212DBK (I ordered two of these, one for backup), but I've been looking at getting a BDR-S13E-X instead. What really is the difference between them? Is the S13E really that much quieter/more reliable/faster to justify the price difference? I don't mind spending more for a better product.

Thanks,
exx
Other people might disagree but i think the 13s are just overpriced compared to the 12s. Pioneer did a lot of yaddayadda to justify the higher prices before they got out of business.
So this shit is basically a huge ripoff then no? https://shop.uhdfriendlydrives.co.uk/pr ... e-friendly

This is what I ordered two of: https://www.ebay.com/itm/316022359451.
The drive you have ordered on eBay has a plastic laser lens instead of glass, unlike the premium models? However, we wish you well with your new model. Sorry you feel our shit is a ripoff?

Why are higher-quality drives more expensive?

https://pioneer-blurayodd.eu/products/b ... /index.php

https://pioneer-blurayodd.eu/products/b ... /index.php

Kind Regards

Asmcom :mrgreen:

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:47 pm
by exxxx
asmcom wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:41 pm
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:32 pm
Coopervid wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:06 pm

Other people might disagree but i think the 13s are just overpriced compared to the 12s. Pioneer did a lot of yaddayadda to justify the higher prices before they got out of business.
So this shit is basically a huge ripoff then no? https://shop.uhdfriendlydrives.co.uk/pr ... e-friendly

This is what I ordered two of: https://www.ebay.com/itm/316022359451.
The drive you have ordered on eBay has a plastic laser lens instead of glass, unlike the premium models? However, we wish you well with your new model. Sorry you feel our shit is a ripoff?

Kind Regards

Asmcom
Sure your website is the one I have linked but it's really not a critique of your store specifically: I mean it more about the market price for these drives. The only reason I linked asmcom is because that's where I found it in stock. Just trying to understand the price difference. It's like 4x the cost of the other drives I just ordered so I think it warrants some skepticism. Obviously I'm not an expert on optical drives otherwise I wouldn't be posting here asking a question.

Kind Regards

exx

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:33 am
by asmcom
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:47 pm
asmcom wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:41 pm
exxxx wrote:
Sun Jun 15, 2025 11:32 pm


So this shit is basically a huge ripoff then no? https://shop.uhdfriendlydrives.co.uk/pr ... e-friendly

This is what I ordered two of: https://www.ebay.com/itm/316022359451.
The drive you have ordered on eBay has a plastic laser lens instead of glass, unlike the premium models? However, we wish you well with your new model. Sorry you feel our shit is a ripoff?

Kind Regards

Asmcom
Sure your website is the one I have linked but it's really not a critique of your store specifically: I mean it more about the market price for these drives. The only reason I linked asmcom is because that's where I found it in stock. Just trying to understand the price difference. It's like 4x the cost of the other drives I just ordered so I think it warrants some skepticism. Obviously I'm not an expert on optical drives otherwise I wouldn't be posting here asking a question.

Kind Regards

exx
It is called the real world!

We stocked the BDR-X13E-X Blu-ray Writer drives earlier this year and back in October 2024, but unfortunately, they’ve become extremely difficult to source. Like the Pioneer Premium BDR-S13E-X, they’re now considered collector’s items and are selling very quickly.

As some of you may know, I’ve been very unwell over the past 12 months, spending long periods in hospital receiving treatment. During this time, we successfully secured several batches of Pioneer drives from Pioneer Europe. However, with each new batch, the cost has increased significantly. Pioneer appears to have recognised the value of these drives and, unfortunately, raised their prices dramatically.

Due to this, we strongly recommend that anyone interested in securing one of these premium drives do so promptly rather than later. As we work through the remaining stock, each new batch reflects the higher prices we paid, and we doubt you will have another opportunity to purchase these drives again. The BDR-S13EBK is also an excellent drive. Both these models work excellently with the Vantec DX2, and we have had no issues whatsoever with Vantec DX2 5.25" enclosures.

We appreciate your understanding and ongoing support.

Asmcom :mrgreen:

https://shop.uhdfriendlydrives.co.uk/pr ... e-friendly

https://shop.uhdfriendlydrives.co.uk/pr ... -variation

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:18 am
by exxxx
I don't really think that this thread has any bit accomplished the point of it's existence. I'm asking for a simple explanation or personal experience as to why some pioneer drives are more expensive than others and instead got a lecture on scarcity while my thread got hijacked by a glowing neon advertisement. I never intended to start any sort of fight with you and I find it extremely odd that you would spend your energy sending sarcastic messages especially when you mention your health isn't 100%.

All of this being said I have no real beef with you and am STILL considering purchasing from your site if a 13 model is worth the price for functionality and not just rarity. What do these more expensive models have that will actually effect my experience as a regular user versus sticking with the 12's I already purchased. I don't want any marketing snake oil mumbo jumbo. If it rips faster, how faster? If it rips more consistently, how much more consistently? If it's more reliable, how much more reliable?

I hope we can come to an understanding.

Thanks

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:30 am
by VA1DER
exxxx wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:18 am
if a 13 model is worth the price for functionality and not just rarity. What do these more expensive models have that will actually effect my experience as a regular user versus sticking with the 12's I already purchased.
Well, it's not quite as simple. The 12 you have is a 212, not an S12. And the 13s you are comparing against are S13s.

So what was said elsewhere in this thread applies, and almost everything said is relevant to some part of that comparison. The information is mostly all there, you're not piecing it together. So there are two relevant comparisons. The difference between 2XX versus SXX, and the difference between 12 vs 13.

The 12 vs 13 is mostly hype. There wasn't, as far as I can see, a lot done between those generations. I suspect the song and dance Pioneer did was just a way to justify a price hike. That said, the prices on the old 12 line didn't reflect the actual qualitative difference between Pioneers and other brands, so the price increase on the 13 line was not out of spec with the quality difference between the Pioneers and everyone else. Plextor, back in 2012, may have come close to Pioneer in quality. But they gave up in 2014 and today no one else comes close to a Pioneer. Right now a Pioneer is to LG what LG is to a generic Matsu-shit-a.

The 2XX vs SXX is a very real difference. You get two major things in that. The plastic vs glass lens, and the firmware.
2XX:
Plastic lens: Plastic has a higher spherical aberration (affecting focal accuracy especially in multi-layer), a higher coefficient of thermal expansion (meaning the focus drifts more with temperature changes), and the manufacturing process (injection molding vs grinding) means loser tolerances all around. Also they are far more subject to scratching. Pioneer drives are fairly dust resistant, but not dust proof and the act of cleaning the lenses, even carefully, can leave microscratches.
2XX Firmware: Non-UHD firmware. Can be "upgraded" with a firmware that will make it think it's an SXX, but that will affect the laser. Many people do it, but you end up with a device that focuses based on the refractive index of the glass lens, instead of the plastic lens. They are not identical, and you end up with inferior burns. They will read mostly as well, so if you are just ripping with them it's not a huge deal. But a genuine SXX will produce better burns than a 2XX made to think it's an SXX. Also, and this burns my bacon a little, the people here who have the firmware will want to soak you $$$ for handing over bootlegged copies. So factor that cost into making a 2XX UHD-ready.

SXX:
Glass lens: Glass has lower spherical aberration, a lower coefficient of thermal expansion, and they are ground rather than molded. SXX's produce the best burns in the world. They are far more resilient against scratches.
SXX Firmware: SXXs are UHD-ready from the get-go, and you don't have to make them something they are not to get that. A post-2022 firmware will not allow them to work with LibreDrive microcode, so if you buy somewhere else on the hopes that you can use them for ripping, factor that in. Mike Admin's announcement that all Pioneer's will be flashable in the future doesn't necessarily mean flashable for free. No one yet knows what this means, it may mean the people with the firmwares will still try and soak you real $$$ for the privelege of bootlegging a firmware. It may be that it ends up like the LG firmwares, open and distributed to all. We don't know yet. But factor that into the cost analysis when you look at the price of getting a drive you know will be LibreDrive ready today.

Bottom line, an S13 is superior to your 212 not because it's a 13, but because it's an S. I would personally rather have an SXX vs a 2XX and have put my money where my mouth is. I have a BDR-X13JBK, and have a BDR-S13UBK coming in tomorrow. I also have a BDR-S11JBK with a 2018 firmware coming in, also possibly tomorrow. I bought my original BDR-X13JBK back when I didn't think it would ever operate as a Blu-Ray ripper, simply because I wanted an optical drive that produced the best burns possible. I ordered it a week before Pioneer's announcement, and thank my lucky stars I did. The other two drives, the S13UBK I ordered as a spare, and the S11JBK I ordered because it I want a Pioneer ripper.

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:34 pm
by exxxx
Thank you VA1DER,

This is exactly the kind of response that I was looking for when I created this thread. Appreciate you putting it together for me.

I think I'm going to stick with the 2 212's I ordered solely because I have no plans of burning discs any time soon; well that and the fact they're like a a fifth of the cost of an s13 haha.

I feel very grateful for the information provided by the forum and of course the MakeMKV application itself. Hope everyone has a great weekend coming up for them.

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:01 am
by asmcom
VA1DER wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:30 am
exxxx wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:18 am
if a 13 model is worth the price for functionality and not just rarity. What do these more expensive models have that will actually effect my experience as a regular user versus sticking with the 12's I already purchased.
Well, it's not quite as simple. The 12 you have is a 212, not an S12. And the 13s you are comparing against are S13s.

So what was said elsewhere in this thread applies, and almost everything said is relevant to some part of that comparison. The information is mostly all there, you're not piecing it together. So there are two relevant comparisons. The difference between 2XX versus SXX, and the difference between 12 vs 13.

The 12 vs 13 is mostly hype. There wasn't, as far as I can see, a lot done between those generations. I suspect the song and dance Pioneer did was just a way to justify a price hike. That said, the prices on the old 12 line didn't reflect the actual qualitative difference between Pioneers and other brands, so the price increase on the 13 line was not out of spec with the quality difference between the Pioneers and everyone else. Plextor, back in 2012, may have come close to Pioneer in quality. But they gave up in 2014 and today no one else comes close to a Pioneer. Right now a Pioneer is to LG what LG is to a generic Matsu-shit-a.

The 2XX vs SXX is a very real difference. You get two major things in that. The plastic vs glass lens, and the firmware.
2XX:
Plastic lens: Plastic has a higher spherical aberration (affecting focal accuracy especially in multi-layer), a higher coefficient of thermal expansion (meaning the focus drifts more with temperature changes), and the manufacturing process (injection molding vs grinding) means loser tolerances all around. Also they are far more subject to scratching. Pioneer drives are fairly dust resistant, but not dust proof and the act of cleaning the lenses, even carefully, can leave microscratches.
2XX Firmware: Non-UHD firmware. Can be "upgraded" with a firmware that will make it think it's an SXX, but that will affect the laser. Many people do it, but you end up with a device that focuses based on the refractive index of the glass lens, instead of the plastic lens. They are not identical, and you end up with inferior burns. They will read mostly as well, so if you are just ripping with them it's not a huge deal. But a genuine SXX will produce better burns than a 2XX made to think it's an SXX. Also, and this burns my bacon a little, the people here who have the firmware will want to soak you $$$ for handing over bootlegged copies. So factor that cost into making a 2XX UHD-ready.

SXX:
Glass lens: Glass has lower spherical aberration, a lower coefficient of thermal expansion, and they are ground rather than molded. SXX's produce the best burns in the world. They are far more resilient against scratches.
SXX Firmware: SXXs are UHD-ready from the get-go, and you don't have to make them something they are not to get that. A post-2022 firmware will not allow them to work with LibreDrive microcode, so if you buy somewhere else on the hopes that you can use them for ripping, factor that in. Mike Admin's announcement that all Pioneer's will be flashable in the future doesn't necessarily mean flashable for free. No one yet knows what this means, it may mean the people with the firmwares will still try and soak you real $$$ for the privelege of bootlegging a firmware. It may be that it ends up like the LG firmwares, open and distributed to all. We don't know yet. But factor that into the cost analysis when you look at the price of getting a drive you know will be LibreDrive ready today.

Bottom line, an S13 is superior to your 212 not because it's a 13, but because it's an S. I would personally rather have an SXX vs a 2XX and have put my money where my mouth is. I have a BDR-X13JBK, and have a BDR-S13UBK coming in tomorrow. I also have a BDR-S11JBK with a 2018 firmware coming in, also possibly tomorrow. I bought my original BDR-X13JBK back when I didn't think it would ever operate as a Blu-Ray ripper, simply because I wanted an optical drive that produced the best burns possible. I ordered it a week before Pioneer's announcement, and thank my lucky stars I did. The other two drives, the S13UBK I ordered as a spare, and the S11JBK I ordered because it I want a Pioneer ripper.
Great post, avpist, a very well articulated and informative.
We were particularly impressed with your breakdown of the differences between the S and 2XX Pioneer models, especially your insights into the glass versus plastic lens and the real world implications of each on performance and burn quality.

As you've rightly highlighted, the generational jump from the 12 to 13 series isn’t as significant as the distinction between the S and 2XX model lines themselves. The S-series firmware and optical design genuinely make a difference, especially for users who care about data integrity, burn quality, and UHD compatibility out of the box.

Your comment on the potential issues of retrofitting a 2XX with UHD-capable firmware particularly the mismatch between firmware calibration and lens material is spot on. It’s a detail often missed and one we stress to customers considering the cost-benefit analysis of going for a cheaper model versus investing in an S12/S13.

Also appreciated was your mention of the ongoing uncertainty around future firmware availability and potential costs, this is something we’re keeping a close eye on as well.

Thanks again for taking the time to post such a thorough and well-reasoned explanation.

Asmcom UHD Friendly Drive Team :mrgreen:

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:52 pm
by Coopervid
VA1DER wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:30 am
exxxx wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:18 am
if a 13 model is worth the price for functionality and not just rarity. What do these more expensive models have that will actually effect my experience as a regular user versus sticking with the 12's I already purchased.
Well, it's not quite as simple. The 12 you have is a 212, not an S12. And the 13s you are comparing against are S13s.

So what was said elsewhere in this thread applies, and almost everything said is relevant to some part of that comparison. The information is mostly all there, you're not piecing it together. So there are two relevant comparisons. The difference between 2XX versus SXX, and the difference between 12 vs 13.

The 12 vs 13 is mostly hype. There wasn't, as far as I can see, a lot done between those generations. I suspect the song and dance Pioneer did was just a way to justify a price hike. That said, the prices on the old 12 line didn't reflect the actual qualitative difference between Pioneers and other brands, so the price increase on the 13 line was not out of spec with the quality difference between the Pioneers and everyone else. Plextor, back in 2012, may have come close to Pioneer in quality. But they gave up in 2014 and today no one else comes close to a Pioneer. Right now a Pioneer is to LG what LG is to a generic Matsu-shit-a.

The 2XX vs SXX is a very real difference. You get two major things in that. The plastic vs glass lens, and the firmware.
2XX:
Plastic lens: Plastic has a higher spherical aberration (affecting focal accuracy especially in multi-layer), a higher coefficient of thermal expansion (meaning the focus drifts more with temperature changes), and the manufacturing process (injection molding vs grinding) means loser tolerances all around. Also they are far more subject to scratching. Pioneer drives are fairly dust resistant, but not dust proof and the act of cleaning the lenses, even carefully, can leave microscratches.
2XX Firmware: Non-UHD firmware. Can be "upgraded" with a firmware that will make it think it's an SXX, but that will affect the laser. Many people do it, but you end up with a device that focuses based on the refractive index of the glass lens, instead of the plastic lens. They are not identical, and you end up with inferior burns. They will read mostly as well, so if you are just ripping with them it's not a huge deal. But a genuine SXX will produce better burns than a 2XX made to think it's an SXX. Also, and this burns my bacon a little, the people here who have the firmware will want to soak you $$$ for handing over bootlegged copies. So factor that cost into making a 2XX UHD-ready.

SXX:
Glass lens: Glass has lower spherical aberration, a lower coefficient of thermal expansion, and they are ground rather than molded. SXX's produce the best burns in the world. They are far more resilient against scratches.
SXX Firmware: SXXs are UHD-ready from the get-go, and you don't have to make them something they are not to get that. A post-2022 firmware will not allow them to work with LibreDrive microcode, so if you buy somewhere else on the hopes that you can use them for ripping, factor that in. Mike Admin's announcement that all Pioneer's will be flashable in the future doesn't necessarily mean flashable for free. No one yet knows what this means, it may mean the people with the firmwares will still try and soak you real $$$ for the privelege of bootlegging a firmware. It may be that it ends up like the LG firmwares, open and distributed to all. We don't know yet. But factor that into the cost analysis when you look at the price of getting a drive you know will be LibreDrive ready today.

Bottom line, an S13 is superior to your 212 not because it's a 13, but because it's an S. I would personally rather have an SXX vs a 2XX and have put my money where my mouth is. I have a BDR-X13JBK, and have a BDR-S13UBK coming in tomorrow. I also have a BDR-S11JBK with a 2018 firmware coming in, also possibly tomorrow. I bought my original BDR-X13JBK back when I didn't think it would ever operate as a Blu-Ray ripper, simply because I wanted an optical drive that produced the best burns possible. I ordered it a week before Pioneer's announcement, and thank my lucky stars I did. The other two drives, the S13UBK I ordered as a spare, and the S11JBK I ordered because it I want a Pioneer ripper.
As far as I know only the 212DBK has a plastic lens since the 212EBK is also BDXL enabled. To my knowledge the difference between S12 and 212 is that the S12s are coming with software and the 212 are OEM models w/o software.
Regarding burning the plastic lens is for sure worse than the glass lens but the focus issue you mention is just speculation.
Also, we did comparisons with VPTools on burns with 13s and 12s and there was no difference. The main factor was always the media and that gets worse and worse. Therefore I strongly recommend to get away from burning and store everything on hard disc. Especially 50GB discs are just mere junk since Verbatim gave up production in Japan (the last really good 50 GB discs). See some examples here and hardware defect management is also explained if you still want to burn.

https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=185539&page=19

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:39 pm
by asmcom
Coopervid wrote:
Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:52 pm
VA1DER wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:30 am
exxxx wrote:
Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:18 am
if a 13 model is worth the price for functionality and not just rarity. What do these more expensive models have that will actually effect my experience as a regular user versus sticking with the 12's I already purchased.
Well, it's not quite as simple. The 12 you have is a 212, not an S12. And the 13s you are comparing against are S13s.

So what was said elsewhere in this thread applies, and almost everything said is relevant to some part of that comparison. The information is mostly all there, you're not piecing it together. So there are two relevant comparisons. The difference between 2XX versus SXX, and the difference between 12 vs 13.

The 12 vs 13 is mostly hype. There wasn't, as far as I can see, a lot done between those generations. I suspect the song and dance Pioneer did was just a way to justify a price hike. That said, the prices on the old 12 line didn't reflect the actual qualitative difference between Pioneers and other brands, so the price increase on the 13 line was not out of spec with the quality difference between the Pioneers and everyone else. Plextor, back in 2012, may have come close to Pioneer in quality. But they gave up in 2014 and today no one else comes close to a Pioneer. Right now a Pioneer is to LG what LG is to a generic Matsu-shit-a.

The 2XX vs SXX is a very real difference. You get two major things in that. The plastic vs glass lens, and the firmware.
2XX:
Plastic lens: Plastic has a higher spherical aberration (affecting focal accuracy especially in multi-layer), a higher coefficient of thermal expansion (meaning the focus drifts more with temperature changes), and the manufacturing process (injection molding vs grinding) means loser tolerances all around. Also they are far more subject to scratching. Pioneer drives are fairly dust resistant, but not dust proof and the act of cleaning the lenses, even carefully, can leave microscratches.
2XX Firmware: Non-UHD firmware. Can be "upgraded" with a firmware that will make it think it's an SXX, but that will affect the laser. Many people do it, but you end up with a device that focuses based on the refractive index of the glass lens, instead of the plastic lens. They are not identical, and you end up with inferior burns. They will read mostly as well, so if you are just ripping with them it's not a huge deal. But a genuine SXX will produce better burns than a 2XX made to think it's an SXX. Also, and this burns my bacon a little, the people here who have the firmware will want to soak you $$$ for handing over bootlegged copies. So factor that cost into making a 2XX UHD-ready.

SXX:
Glass lens: Glass has lower spherical aberration, a lower coefficient of thermal expansion, and they are ground rather than molded. SXX's produce the best burns in the world. They are far more resilient against scratches.
SXX Firmware: SXXs are UHD-ready from the get-go, and you don't have to make them something they are not to get that. A post-2022 firmware will not allow them to work with LibreDrive microcode, so if you buy somewhere else on the hopes that you can use them for ripping, factor that in. Mike Admin's announcement that all Pioneer's will be flashable in the future doesn't necessarily mean flashable for free. No one yet knows what this means, it may mean the people with the firmwares will still try and soak you real $$$ for the privelege of bootlegging a firmware. It may be that it ends up like the LG firmwares, open and distributed to all. We don't know yet. But factor that into the cost analysis when you look at the price of getting a drive you know will be LibreDrive ready today.

Bottom line, an S13 is superior to your 212 not because it's a 13, but because it's an S. I would personally rather have an SXX vs a 2XX and have put my money where my mouth is. I have a BDR-X13JBK, and have a BDR-S13UBK coming in tomorrow. I also have a BDR-S11JBK with a 2018 firmware coming in, also possibly tomorrow. I bought my original BDR-X13JBK back when I didn't think it would ever operate as a Blu-Ray ripper, simply because I wanted an optical drive that produced the best burns possible. I ordered it a week before Pioneer's announcement, and thank my lucky stars I did. The other two drives, the S13UBK I ordered as a spare, and the S11JBK I ordered because it I want a Pioneer ripper.
As far as I know only the 212DBK has a plastic lens since the 212EBK is also BDXL enabled. To my knowledge the difference between S12 and 212 is that the S12s are coming with software and the 212 are OEM models w/o software.
Regarding burning the plastic lens is for sure worse than the glass lens but the focus issue you mention is just speculation.
Also, we did comparisons with VPTools on burns with 13s and 12s and there was no difference. The main factor was always the media and that gets worse and worse. Therefore I strongly recommend to get away from burning and store everything on hard disc. Especially 50GB discs are just mere junk since Verbatim gave up production in Japan (the last really good 50 GB discs). See some examples here and hardware defect management is also explained if you still want to burn.

https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=185539&page=19
The BDR-212DBK is a lower budget model and it does have the plastic lens. The pioneer technical department at the time made us aware of these differences. We reviewed and tested this drive for 3 months and decided not to stock this model. The BDR-212EBK has a glass lens which we did stock.

Kind Regards

Asmcom

Re: Comparing Pioneer UHD Models

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:04 pm
by Coopervid
asmcom, thanks for confirming that only the 212DBK has the plastic lens. Regarding flashing: Only donations are asked for. That's it as far as I'm concerned.