Page 1 of 1
ISO vs MKV
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 3:24 am
by t3t4-
I ask you which do you prefer and why:
ISO the complete disk?
MKV split into pieces and parts?
Don't hate me, but I've been using AnyDVD for 'decades', mostly because I can copy an entire disk to an ISO.
If this has already been bled to death elsewhere, just point me to where please.
Thanks in advance.
Re: ISO vs MKV
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 6:55 am
by Ezatoka
That might depend on what one wants to achieve.
I have a NAS with like 65TB. Whenever I get a DVD or BluRay, first thing I do is create an ISO backup of the disk and put it onto the NAS.
Then I go ahead and rip the ISO to get the various MKV files and transcode them with handbrake. So in the end I have both, the original ISO (usually stripped of its copy protection) and the transcoded MKV files.
Advantage: Whenever there is a new codec (like AV1 or something newer even) or better filters for old movies, I can rip the ISO again and transcode it again, without having to touch the physical disc (which can and will deteriorate over the years)
Disadvantage: It takes up lots of space.
Keeping the whole ISO is usually for people who want to keep the menu structure. Though I am not sure if any external player like Plex or alike can just open such an ISO to do that.
Re: ISO vs MKV
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:23 pm
by Woodstock
If you want everything on the disk, ISO is a good way to go.
If you want the movie itself, why bother saving "everything else"?
Re: ISO vs MKV
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2023 3:55 pm
by flojo
I keep all the files from the disc but, not in a .iso.
The .iso file seems pointless to me. Even if the TOC/LBA of the UDF image is intact, it's still going to be a bootleg if you burn it out. Loosing the TOC index doesn't seem like a real loss, but if I knew how to save the TOC/LBA without saving the .iso... I would
. Also, as far as I know, there isn't a magic LBA that a file has to be aligned to (like PSP isos or something), so I rrrrrrrealy don't see the point of an .iso.
Questions arise though: Are the files that are decrypted the exact file before the studio/company encrypted it for the disc? Is the TOC/LBA of the udf.iso the same as the disc?
I keep the image files so I can hash them just in case someone starts a DB of the hashes (similar to CUEToolsDB or AccurateRIP). The only disadvantage is an extra ~1.2GB to ~2GB bigger than it is when re-containerizing it. You could use ffmpeg to write the bitstream(s) of a MKV to stdin and hash that way but, that would only be the "main" video and audio files (not other possible pressing/region differences in menus/warnings etc.).